Amazing Opportunities

for everyone

Apply Now

Student Grievance and Appeals Policy

PURPOSE
This policy outlines the rights and processes of Global Leadership Institute (GLI) students to lodge grievances and appeal decisions related to the academic and administrative aspects of their educational experience, which are within the control of the Institute and its management staff.

SCOPE
All current and prospective students.

PRINCIPLES
GLI is committed to providing an effective grievance management system which prioritises the welfare of those involved. GLI ensures:

  • transparent, ethical, and timely processes for addressing grievances and appeals to which the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness are applied, regardless of the campus, mode or potential mode of study;
  • equality and fairness to all parties, without prejudicial treatment;
  • confidentiality for all parties involved;
  • records of all complaints and appeals are kept in the Institute’s formal record keeping system for at least five years, and the parties involved are allowed appropriate access to those records;
  • the right of all parties to have a support person present during meetings;
  • adherence to current legal requirements;
  • independent review of a decision determined in response to a grievance;
  • that there is no fee for grievance processes;
  • the complainant will not suffer any reprisal as a result of lodging a grievance or appeal;
  • the complainant may seek confidential, independent professional advice at any stage of a grievance;
  • the complainant may ask for assistance in the form of a translator/ interpreter at any time during the process;
  • the complainant may continue their studies as usual during the process, except in circumstances where their health or safety is potentially at risk or if they pose a health or safety risk to others;
  • the complainant is kept informed of the progress and outcome decisions of their complaint or appeal;
  • the complainant has the right to refer their complaint or appeal to an external agency.

Academic grievances and appeals may include matters relating to:

  • academic misconduct;
  • assessments (including assignments, tests, examinations);
  • content and delivery of courses or units;
  • advanced standing, cross credit or Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL);
  • selection and admission into a course;
  • special consideration;
  • academic progress.

Administrative grievances and appeals may include matters relating to:

  • admissions;
  • cancellation of enrolment;
  • critical incidents;
  • exclusion;
  • facilities;
  • fee payment and refunds;
  • bullying, discrimination, harassment, or vilification;
  • health and wellbeing;
  • misconduct (other than academic misconduct);
  • personal information;
  • withdrawal without penalty.

DEFINITIONS
Academic decision or action: a decision/action made by a GLI staff member that is directly related to the academic progress of a student or prospective student. This may include but is not restricted to: an issue arising from application into or progression in a course; academic supervision; academic freedom; ethical practice; professional experience performance; quality of assessment feedback; or course workload.

Appeal is an application made by a student or prospective student to have a decision reviewed where that decision relates to a matter affecting an experience at GLI.

Authorised Officer: A relevant GLI staff member with authority who may be approached at any time in relation to the policy, process, and implications of making a grievance or appeal. This may include, but is not limited to, an Administrative Officer, Campus Manager, Program Director, or Registrar.

Grievance means an expression of dissatisfaction by a student or prospective student with GLI (including with agents or other related parties who represent or act on behalf of GLI).

Natural justice principles are broadly summarised as follows:

  • All parties to the matter(s) in dispute, including respondent(s) shall have a right to be heard before a decision is made, including the right to respond to any statements or evidence that may prejudice their case.
  • All relevant submissions, information, and evidence to be considered by the decision maker should be disclosed, where requested, to all parties to the complaint prior to the hearing. Matters that are not relevant shall not be considered by the decision maker.
  • The decision maker/s shall not be biased or appear to be biased (by a reasonable and informed bystander) nor have a vested interest or personal involvement in the matter being considered.
  • In addition to these principles of natural justice, there should be no undue delay in responding to complaints or appeals and all parties to such matters under this policy shall have the right to a representative of their choice, other than a currently practising solicitor or barrister (except in extraordinary circumstances at a hearing with the prior leave of the Chair of the Grievance Appeals panel).

Non-academic decision or action: a decision/action made by an GLI staff member that is not directly related to the academic assessment or progress of a student or prospective student. It may include but is not limited to: customer service and administration; marketing and information; facilities; fees/finance related matters; or health and wellbeing.

Vexatious complaint: complaints or grievances which are considered without merit, malicious or already resolved.

GRIEVANCE APPEALS PANEL

  • The Chair of the Grievance Appeals Panel is appointed by the President.
  • Membership includes:
    • Registrar;
    • at least one academic staff member (not associated with the grievance/appeal);
    • at least one administrative staff member (not associated with the grievance/appeal);
    • a nominee from the Student Representative Group, who cannot act as an advocate for the student or prospective student.
  • The Panel will meet on an as needs basis.
  • Any conflict of interest must be declared, and that panel member must withdraw from the appeal hearing.

Scope

All staff

Key Stakeholder

All staff and students

PROCEDURES
These procedures apply to all students and prospective students of GLI who wish to lodge a grievance or request a review of an academic or administrative decision relevant to their studies.

A student or prospective student is entitled to continue their enrolment or application while an internal review or appeal process is ongoing. However, the student or prospective student is not entitled to enrol in units which are the subject of or consequential to the decision under review and cannot withdraw from a unit with ‘special circumstances’ while the internal review or appeal process is ongoing if this unit is the subject of the decision under review or appeal.

Where a grievant remains dissatisfied with the decision, they are entitled to continue to the next step in the procedures, providing new or additional information is provided to support the case. It is not sufficient to simply disagree with the decision.

Any student or prospective student who provides false or misleading information will have their grievance/appeal application deemed invalid and may be dealt with in accord with the Academic Integrity Policy.

Any student or prospective student who makes a vexatious complaint may be dealt with under the Code of Conduct Policy.

The right to make complaints and seek appeals of decisions and action under various processes does not affect the rights of the student or potential student to take action under the Australian Consumer Law if the Australian Consumer Law applies. A complainant may choose to have their grievance reviewed by an external complaint handling process. In this situation, GLI will not continue further consideration of matters where the process options have been exhausted or where the grievant has taken their grievance to an external agency.

The procedure for the notification and resolution of a grievance related to sexual misconduct is outlined in GLI’s Sexual Assault and Harassment Prevention and Response Policy.

For overseas students studying in Australia where the complaint relates to them being excluded from a course due to not completing their course in the required time frame, not achieving satisfactory attendance, or not making satisfactory course progress, the student will be notified in writing that they will be reported to the Department of Home Affairs and this may result in their student visa being cancelled. The student will be informed that they have 20 working days to access the appeals process.

FORMAL GRIEVANCE/APPEALS PROCESS
In lodging a grievance or applying for a review and/or appeal of a decision, the student or prospective student is expected to follow the process below.

1. INFORMAL RESOLUTION
A student or prospective student who has a grievance should, where possible, discuss this with the GLI staff member responsible for the academic or non-academic decision or action. The GLI staff member will deal with the issue promptly and, where possible provide the person with a full explanation in writing of reasons for the decision or action with a view to avoiding an escalation of the grievance.

If there is a conflict of interest, the staff member should refer the complainant to their supervisor.
Most grievances should be resolved informally.

2. LODGEMENT OF GRIEVANCE/APPEAL FORM

  • If a grievance cannot be resolved informally, the grievant may submit a Grievance Form with the relevant Authorised Officer (usually the supervisor of the staff member involved in the grievance).
  • The grievant must provide the following:
    • nature of the grievance;
    • what actions they have taken to resolve the matter to date;
    • evidence to support their claim;
    • outcomes they are seeking.
  • The grievant is issued with an acknowledgement of receipt of the grievance and advised of the timeframe for review of the grievance matter within five working days.

Any grievance which is anonymous and may allege or involve abuse of a minor or is a protected disclosure of alleged corruption or wrongful conduct in the context of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) is reported immediately to the President (or other suitable Authorised Officer, where relevant).

3. INVESTIGATION AND DECISION

  • The grievant is notified in writing of the outcome within 20 working days of lodgement of the original grievance and of their right to appeal the decision.
  • The grievant is provided with a written statement, which includes a full explanation for the decision.
  • The decision taken may include to:
    • deem the grievance to be invalid.
    • dismiss the matter on the grounds that the grievant has not presented sufficient evidence to justify the matter as a grievance.
    • uphold the grievance and provide a decision based on the evidence, including any agreed actions.
  • A report will be recorded by the Authorised Officer in the GLI Register of Grievances/Appeals.
  • If a grievant is dissatisfied with the internal grievance decision, they can submit a Grievance Appeal Form to appeal the decision.

4. APPEAL OF DECISION

  • Formal appeals are to be made to the Grievance Appeals Panel by lodging a Grievance Appeal Form.
  • In lodging an appeal, the grievant must specify in writing the grounds for appeal and attach copies of all documents relevant to the appeal.
  • The grievant is expected to provide genuine reasons and any additional factual evidence in support of an appeal of a decision. The Institute will not alter a decision merely on the grounds that the grievant disagrees with it. In applying for the review or appeal of a decision, the grievant bears the onus of proof and is responsible for establishing that the decision in the first instance was an unreasonable one.
  • The appeal of decision matter is then dealt with by the Grievance Appeals Panel as soon as practicably possible.

5. GRIEVANCE APPEALS PANEL

  • The Chair of the Grievance Appeals Panel will convene the Panel to discuss the matter within five working days of receiving the appeal, ensuring that members of the panel are not those who have previously dealt with the grievance, and are experienced in the area of concern.
  • The appellant is provided an opportunity to formally present their case to the Panel and bring a support person to the Panel hearing.
  • The decision of the Panel is the final internal decision and a formal report will be prepared within five working days after the Panel meeting.
  • The Panel may take any of the following actions:
    • deem the appeal to be invalid.
    • dismiss the appeal on the grounds that the decision taken was right and proper, and/or the appellant has not presented sufficient evidence to justify further consideration of the appeal; and in so doing affirm the decision in its original form.
    • uphold the appeal after establishing that there is sufficient evidence to support the finding that the decision taken was unreasonable.
  • Where an appeal has been rejected by the Panel on the grounds of it being found to be invalid or lacking in sufficient evidence to justify further consideration, there is no further internal avenue for the appellant to appeal.

6. NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION
The Panel Chair provides written notice of the decision to the appellant, including a statement of reasons for making the decision, as well as notifying them of their right to lodge an external appeal if they are unsatisfied with the decision.

The Chair of the Grievance Appeals Panel will also detail if any corrective or preventative actions are to be taken by the Institute because of the decision.

EXTERNAL APPEAL
The appellant may not be satisfied with the outcome of the internal appeal process and is entitled to proceed to an external authority. For an external review to be approved, a complainant must have exhausted the internal grievances procedures outlined in this policy. GLI subscribes to the following external mediator services at no cost to the appellant:

Independent Higher Education Australia (IHEA)
Phone: 03 9642 5212
Email: contact@ihea.edu.au
Website: https://ihea.edu.au

The IHEA appointed external reviewer will make a decision and advise the relevant officer of GLI, the appellant, and IHEA within 30 days, providing in writing the reasons and rationale for any decisions and/or actions to be taken. The relevant GLI officer will ensure that recommendations of the IHEA appointed external reviewer are implemented within 20 working days. Decisions of the appointed reviewer shall be final and binding on all parties.

OR

Nominations Services Officer
Resolution Institute, Level 2, 13-15 Bridge Street, Sydney 2000
Email: infoaus@resolution.institute
Website: www.resolution.institute

There is no cost for the student to access external mediation from the nominated services listed above.

International Students
International students or prospective students who wish to lodge an external appeal can contact the Overseas Students Ombudsman. This service is free. See the Overseas Students Ombudsman for more information.

The appellant and GLI are bound by the decision of the ombudsman and such decisions are final and non-reviewable. While the parties attempt to resolve the matter, an enrolled student may continue to attend classes as normal unless the student has a reasonable concern about an imminent risk to their health and safety.

CONFIDENTIALITY
All documentation relating to grievances or appeals will be kept confidential and will be disclosed only to those persons who have a right to the information by virtue of their role in the review or appeal process, or as required by law.

Fact Box

Owner : Chair, Executive Management Team

Approval Body : Executive Management Team

Endorsement Body : Executive Management Team

Category : Executive

Approval Date :

Review Date :

Version :

Related Policies :

Close

Associate Professor Jason Hartley

Jason Hartley is lecturer in criminology at Griffith University in Brisbane, Australia. He is a former police officer with 23 years of experience, and has trained personnel for deployment in Timor Leste, the Solomon Islands, Iraq and Afghanistan. Jason specializes in, and has published on engagement with Muslim communities, Indigenous Polynesian approaches to rehabilitation and reducing recidivism, and Asian Organised Crime. Jason also completed a community internship in Hebron on the West Bank.

Close

Simone Fulcher

Simone Fulcher is the Campus Manager at Global Leadership Institute responsible for managing the day-to-day operations for the campus. Simone has previously worked in the education sector for over 5 years where she has enjoyed helping young minds realise their potential. Simone also has a history of volunteer work assisting various communities in improving their quality of life in places such as New South Wales, Guam, and Palau. Simone still enjoys volunteering, currently organising events for young adults in Southeast Queensland and helping them form connections their fields of interest.

Close

Professor Grant Pitman

Professor Grant Pitman is the president of the Global Leadership Institute. He has held senior leadership roles in government such as Chief Superintendent of Police and Director of Strategic Planning ICT in the Queensland Police Service;

  • Varied list of contributions to law enforcement, including disaster management, auditing and finance, organizational reform, education and human resources, and policy development
  • National, state, and regional levels of professional service, including the Ipswich Economic Forum, the Brisbane Airport Emergency Planning Committee, the National Emergency Communications Working Group, the National Police Drug and Alcohol Task Force, and the Police Education Advisory Council.

He has a Ph.D. and Master of Administration from Griffith University. He is a well-versed researcher and has published numerous articles and journals.

Close

Professor Kevin Tickle

Professor Kevin Tickle has extensive experience in Executive Management roles in the tertiary education sector, both public and private, over the last two decades and has been a consultant to Higher Education providers in Australia and overseas. His primary areas of interest are Leadership, Management, Information Technology, Mathematics and Statistics with expertise in the areas of probability modelling; decision support, and data analytics. He is currently a Fellow of the Australian Institute of Management, a member of the Institution of Engineers, Australia, the Australian Computer Society and an Emeritus Professor at CQUniversity.

Close

Mr Des Lacy OAM

Des serves as Secretary/Treasurer of the Asia Pacific Chapter of FBI National Academy Associates, after completing 40 years in the Queensland Police Service. During his distinguished career, Des was District Officer (A/Chief Superintendent) in Charge of the Gold Coast Police District, Police Commander for the Gold Coast Indy, Super V8s, Gold Coast Marathon, and Schoolies, as well as National Rugby League and Australian Foot League events in Brisbane and the Gold Coast. Des oversaw development and implementation of the Integrated Justice Information Systems, Integrated Traffic Policing Program, and Integrated Tasking and Analysis System. He served as Director of the Strategic Services Branch and Information and Communications Technology Command, as well as Chair of the District Disaster Management Group and Security Operations Coordinator for the 2018 Commonwealth Games. 

Des has been a member of Rotary International for 30 years, representing Rotary International in the United States and the Middle East. For his work in the Gold Coast Community Des was awarded Citizen of the Year at the 2013 Gold Coast Australia Day celebrations. Des also was one of the founding Directors for the Oxenford and Coomera Community Youth Centre that provides much needed social services to the Northern Gold Coast Community. For the past 15 years, he has also been the Chair of this not-for-profit establishment. It. For his work promoting International Law Enforcement Des was awarded the Order of Australia Medal in 2017.

Qualifications

Graduate Diploma of Management

Graduate Certificate Business Management 

Bachelor of Business

Close

Katherine Weissel

Katherine is a security and risk specialist with 25 years’ experience in an Australian Police Force, leading teams and responding to emergency events, complex investigations, and counterterrorism.  She has led and managed several major crime, counterterrorism and public safety operations and investigations, and coordinated teams within police operations centres and major incident rooms.  She has delivered training across multiple Australian jurisdictions in emergency response, counterterrorism, and investigations; and specialised in cyber operations in the counterterrorism environment for a number of years.  She has also been deployed to international jurisdictions supporting complex war crimes investigations and prosecutions.  Since moving into the private sector, Katherine has provided consulting and training services in the areas of security and risk, organisational governance & investigations, and cybersecurity.  Katherine is a sessional tutor in tertiary education in criminal justice studies specialising in counterterrorism, global law, crime and justice, and cybercrime.  She has presented to state and national security, cybersecurity and governmental conferences on contemporary physical & cyber threats and risk management.  Katherine has also been involved in research teams examining government responses to terrorism and extremism, and cybersecurity policy.

Close

Dr Shantanu Banerjee

Dr Shantanu Banerjee is senior lecturer at Leaders Institute. With extensive experience in management, leadership, and administration across a range of contexts in India and Australia, Dr Banerjee is also currently an Industry Fellow at the University of Queensland Business School. His research focuses on socio-cultural-political contexts, particularly in the field of agribusiness and international business. His research has highlighted variations in the theme of international competitiveness by emphasising non-economic and non-market variables and on how multinational enterprises subsidiaries can pursue legitimacy pursuing non-market strategies. 

Dr Banerjee has presented his research work at esteemed international conferences such as ANZIBA and EIA and has published in scholarly journals including International Business Review and Management International Review. He graduated from the Institute of Foreign Trade, New Delhi (India) and the University of Queensland Business School. He has been an academic staff member at the University of Queensland and Queensland University of Technology, lecturing in undergraduate and postgraduate programs. Dr Banerjee has over 15 years of extensive and varied experience as an International Business Manager dealing and negotiating with overseas clients based in the United States of America, China, Japan, Canada, Switzerland, and Germany. He is currently employed with a Federal agency of the Australian Treasury. 

Qualifications

Doctor of Philosophy, University of Queensland, 2012

Master of Research, Queensland University of Technology, 2005

Master of Business, Queensland University of Technology, 2003

Postgraduate Diploma in International Trade, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, 1986

Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering

Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, 1985

 

Communities of Practice

  • Editorial Board, Academy of International Business
  • Editorial Board, European Academy of Management
  • Editorial Board, Leadership & Management Studies in Sub-Sahara Africa Conference
  • Editorial Board, International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business
Close

Associate Professor Ben Arachi

BIOGRAPHY

Associate Professor Ben Arachi has four decades (1977-2023) of experience in higher education leadership and teaching. During his 15 years as Unit Coordinator at Central Queensland University, he received two Excellence in Teaching Awards and was nominated for the Vice-Chancellor’s Award for Outstanding Contributions to Learning and Teaching and the Australian Awards for University Teaching. His online learning study was published in Economics for Today (Cengage 2022).

Previously, Associate Professor Arachi  served as Vice Principal, Head of the Department of Extension and Research, and Editor-in-Chief of the academic journal at Arul Anandar College, India (1992-1997). He was then Research Coordinator and Course Coordinator (1999-2008), as well as Chair of the Division of Economics (2000-2005) at HELP University, Malaysia. This included senior involvement in the application to become a University College and then a full University.

Associate Professor Arachi also has over 20 years of experience as a higher degree research supervisor, moderator, and examiner for doctoral degrees. In his five years as a Coordinator of All India Christian Higher Education, he organised numerous state-level seminars and workshops for academics in higher education in India. He has published four monographs, many research papers and articles while editing the Research AAC Journal of Economics. He has reviewed many higher education textbooks.

QUALIFICATIONS

  • Doctor of Philosophy, Madursi Kamaraj University, India, 1989

  • Master of Arts, University of Madras, 1975 (Gold Medalist)

  • Bachelor of Arts, Madursi Kamaraj University, India, 1973 (University Rank and Merit Scholarship)

  • Diploma in Applied Economics, Madursi Kamaraj University, India, 1980

ACADEMIC LEADERSHIP

  • Member, Academic Board, 2023-current

  • Chair, Examiners Committe, 2023-current

  • Member, Course Advisory Committee, 2022-current

AWARDS

  • Central Queensland University Student Voice Commendation. The 2021 program includes unit evaluation data from term 3, 2020 and terms 1 and 2, 2021.

  • Central Queensland University  Student Voice Commendation. The 2020 program includes unit evaluation data from term 3, 2019 and terms 1 and 2, 2020.

  • Central Queensland University Central Queensland University Platinum certificate Top rated Unit in Term 2, 2019

  • Central Queensland University Gold certificate Highly rated Unit in Term 2,2019 (ACCT20070)

  • Gold certificate Highly rated Unit in Term 2,2019 from CQU(ECON11026)

  • Charles Sturt University Excellence in Teaching Award (ECO511)

Close

Dr Bandula Nambukara-Gamage

Dr Bandula Nambukara-Gamage is a Senior Lecturer of Accounting and Finance at James Cook University, Brisbane campus. He currently teaches Bachelor of Commerce, Bachelor of Accounting, Master of Professional Accounting, and Master of Business Administration students based on the Brisbane campus. Dr Nambukara-Gamage has previously lectured at Central Queensland University, Federation University, and Charles Darwin University.

QUALIFICATIONS

Doctor of Philosophy, University of New England, 2013

Master of Commerce

Licentiate Certificate (recognised by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Australia)

Bachelor of Business Administration (Honours)

Close

Professor Rod St Hill

Professor Rodney St Hill is the former President of Leaders Institute (2018-2020) and serves as Senior Pastor (2016-current) at IgniteLife Church Gold Coast, where he heads IgniteLife Business, an outreach to Christians in business. He is a leader in the global Business As Mission movement. He also consults on governance and executive management in higher education and business, with a particular special interest in Christian education institutions and businesses.

Previously, Professor St Hill was a long-term senior leader and Vice President Academic of Christian Heritage College, Brisbane. With the input of his colleagues and many others in his network, he developed business curriculum that embeds the ‘5 P missional business’ model – a model of production, people, planet, and profit. He was also Dean of Students, among other roles, at University of Southern Queensland (1993-2009).

QUALIFICATIONS

Doctor of Philosophy, University of Cantebury, 1989

Bachelor of Commerce (Hons 1), University of Newcastle, 1979

EXTERNAL EXPERT REVIEWER

External Member, various course assessment panels in business, management and leadership at Alphacrucis College, Australian College of Divinity, and Avondale University College, 2014 to 2020

Member: Australian Institute of Company Directors

COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE

Member: Economic Society of Australia

External Expert, Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA), 2019-current

Close

Student Grievance and Appeals Policy

PURPOSE
This policy outlines the rights and processes of Global Leadership Institute (GLI) students to lodge grievances and appeal decisions related to the academic and administrative aspects of their educational experience, which are within the control of the Institute and its management staff.

SCOPE
All current and prospective students.

PRINCIPLES
GLI is committed to providing an effective grievance management system which prioritises the welfare of those involved. GLI ensures:

  • transparent, ethical, and timely processes for addressing grievances and appeals to which the principles of natural justice and procedural fairness are applied, regardless of the campus, mode or potential mode of study;
  • equality and fairness to all parties, without prejudicial treatment;
  • confidentiality for all parties involved;
  • records of all complaints and appeals are kept in the Institute’s formal record keeping system for at least five years, and the parties involved are allowed appropriate access to those records;
  • the right of all parties to have a support person present during meetings;
  • adherence to current legal requirements;
  • independent review of a decision determined in response to a grievance;
  • that there is no fee for grievance processes;
  • the complainant will not suffer any reprisal as a result of lodging a grievance or appeal;
  • the complainant may seek confidential, independent professional advice at any stage of a grievance;
  • the complainant may ask for assistance in the form of a translator/ interpreter at any time during the process;
  • the complainant may continue their studies as usual during the process, except in circumstances where their health or safety is potentially at risk or if they pose a health or safety risk to others;
  • the complainant is kept informed of the progress and outcome decisions of their complaint or appeal;
  • the complainant has the right to refer their complaint or appeal to an external agency.

Academic grievances and appeals may include matters relating to:

  • academic misconduct;
  • assessments (including assignments, tests, examinations);
  • content and delivery of courses or units;
  • advanced standing, cross credit or Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL);
  • selection and admission into a course;
  • special consideration;
  • academic progress.

Administrative grievances and appeals may include matters relating to:

  • admissions;
  • cancellation of enrolment;
  • critical incidents;
  • exclusion;
  • facilities;
  • fee payment and refunds;
  • bullying, discrimination, harassment, or vilification;
  • health and wellbeing;
  • misconduct (other than academic misconduct);
  • personal information;
  • withdrawal without penalty.

DEFINITIONS
Academic decision or action: a decision/action made by a GLI staff member that is directly related to the academic progress of a student or prospective student. This may include but is not restricted to: an issue arising from application into or progression in a course; academic supervision; academic freedom; ethical practice; professional experience performance; quality of assessment feedback; or course workload.

Appeal is an application made by a student or prospective student to have a decision reviewed where that decision relates to a matter affecting an experience at GLI.

Authorised Officer: A relevant GLI staff member with authority who may be approached at any time in relation to the policy, process, and implications of making a grievance or appeal. This may include, but is not limited to, an Administrative Officer, Campus Manager, Program Director, or Registrar.

Grievance means an expression of dissatisfaction by a student or prospective student with GLI (including with agents or other related parties who represent or act on behalf of GLI).

Natural justice principles are broadly summarised as follows:

  • All parties to the matter(s) in dispute, including respondent(s) shall have a right to be heard before a decision is made, including the right to respond to any statements or evidence that may prejudice their case.
  • All relevant submissions, information, and evidence to be considered by the decision maker should be disclosed, where requested, to all parties to the complaint prior to the hearing. Matters that are not relevant shall not be considered by the decision maker.
  • The decision maker/s shall not be biased or appear to be biased (by a reasonable and informed bystander) nor have a vested interest or personal involvement in the matter being considered.
  • In addition to these principles of natural justice, there should be no undue delay in responding to complaints or appeals and all parties to such matters under this policy shall have the right to a representative of their choice, other than a currently practising solicitor or barrister (except in extraordinary circumstances at a hearing with the prior leave of the Chair of the Grievance Appeals panel).

Non-academic decision or action: a decision/action made by an GLI staff member that is not directly related to the academic assessment or progress of a student or prospective student. It may include but is not limited to: customer service and administration; marketing and information; facilities; fees/finance related matters; or health and wellbeing.

Vexatious complaint: complaints or grievances which are considered without merit, malicious or already resolved.

GRIEVANCE APPEALS PANEL

  • The Chair of the Grievance Appeals Panel is appointed by the President.
  • Membership includes:
    • Registrar;
    • at least one academic staff member (not associated with the grievance/appeal);
    • at least one administrative staff member (not associated with the grievance/appeal);
    • a nominee from the Student Representative Group, who cannot act as an advocate for the student or prospective student.
  • The Panel will meet on an as needs basis.
  • Any conflict of interest must be declared, and that panel member must withdraw from the appeal hearing.

Scope

All staff

Key Stakeholder

All staff and students

PROCEDURES
These procedures apply to all students and prospective students of GLI who wish to lodge a grievance or request a review of an academic or administrative decision relevant to their studies.

A student or prospective student is entitled to continue their enrolment or application while an internal review or appeal process is ongoing. However, the student or prospective student is not entitled to enrol in units which are the subject of or consequential to the decision under review and cannot withdraw from a unit with ‘special circumstances’ while the internal review or appeal process is ongoing if this unit is the subject of the decision under review or appeal.

Where a grievant remains dissatisfied with the decision, they are entitled to continue to the next step in the procedures, providing new or additional information is provided to support the case. It is not sufficient to simply disagree with the decision.

Any student or prospective student who provides false or misleading information will have their grievance/appeal application deemed invalid and may be dealt with in accord with the Academic Integrity Policy.

Any student or prospective student who makes a vexatious complaint may be dealt with under the Code of Conduct Policy.

The right to make complaints and seek appeals of decisions and action under various processes does not affect the rights of the student or potential student to take action under the Australian Consumer Law if the Australian Consumer Law applies. A complainant may choose to have their grievance reviewed by an external complaint handling process. In this situation, GLI will not continue further consideration of matters where the process options have been exhausted or where the grievant has taken their grievance to an external agency.

The procedure for the notification and resolution of a grievance related to sexual misconduct is outlined in GLI’s Sexual Assault and Harassment Prevention and Response Policy.

For overseas students studying in Australia where the complaint relates to them being excluded from a course due to not completing their course in the required time frame, not achieving satisfactory attendance, or not making satisfactory course progress, the student will be notified in writing that they will be reported to the Department of Home Affairs and this may result in their student visa being cancelled. The student will be informed that they have 20 working days to access the appeals process.

FORMAL GRIEVANCE/APPEALS PROCESS
In lodging a grievance or applying for a review and/or appeal of a decision, the student or prospective student is expected to follow the process below.

1. INFORMAL RESOLUTION
A student or prospective student who has a grievance should, where possible, discuss this with the GLI staff member responsible for the academic or non-academic decision or action. The GLI staff member will deal with the issue promptly and, where possible provide the person with a full explanation in writing of reasons for the decision or action with a view to avoiding an escalation of the grievance.

If there is a conflict of interest, the staff member should refer the complainant to their supervisor.
Most grievances should be resolved informally.

2. LODGEMENT OF GRIEVANCE/APPEAL FORM

  • If a grievance cannot be resolved informally, the grievant may submit a Grievance Form with the relevant Authorised Officer (usually the supervisor of the staff member involved in the grievance).
  • The grievant must provide the following:
    • nature of the grievance;
    • what actions they have taken to resolve the matter to date;
    • evidence to support their claim;
    • outcomes they are seeking.
  • The grievant is issued with an acknowledgement of receipt of the grievance and advised of the timeframe for review of the grievance matter within five working days.

Any grievance which is anonymous and may allege or involve abuse of a minor or is a protected disclosure of alleged corruption or wrongful conduct in the context of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) is reported immediately to the President (or other suitable Authorised Officer, where relevant).

3. INVESTIGATION AND DECISION

  • The grievant is notified in writing of the outcome within 20 working days of lodgement of the original grievance and of their right to appeal the decision.
  • The grievant is provided with a written statement, which includes a full explanation for the decision.
  • The decision taken may include to:
    • deem the grievance to be invalid.
    • dismiss the matter on the grounds that the grievant has not presented sufficient evidence to justify the matter as a grievance.
    • uphold the grievance and provide a decision based on the evidence, including any agreed actions.
  • A report will be recorded by the Authorised Officer in the GLI Register of Grievances/Appeals.
  • If a grievant is dissatisfied with the internal grievance decision, they can submit a Grievance Appeal Form to appeal the decision.

4. APPEAL OF DECISION

  • Formal appeals are to be made to the Grievance Appeals Panel by lodging a Grievance Appeal Form.
  • In lodging an appeal, the grievant must specify in writing the grounds for appeal and attach copies of all documents relevant to the appeal.
  • The grievant is expected to provide genuine reasons and any additional factual evidence in support of an appeal of a decision. The Institute will not alter a decision merely on the grounds that the grievant disagrees with it. In applying for the review or appeal of a decision, the grievant bears the onus of proof and is responsible for establishing that the decision in the first instance was an unreasonable one.
  • The appeal of decision matter is then dealt with by the Grievance Appeals Panel as soon as practicably possible.

5. GRIEVANCE APPEALS PANEL

  • The Chair of the Grievance Appeals Panel will convene the Panel to discuss the matter within five working days of receiving the appeal, ensuring that members of the panel are not those who have previously dealt with the grievance, and are experienced in the area of concern.
  • The appellant is provided an opportunity to formally present their case to the Panel and bring a support person to the Panel hearing.
  • The decision of the Panel is the final internal decision and a formal report will be prepared within five working days after the Panel meeting.
  • The Panel may take any of the following actions:
    • deem the appeal to be invalid.
    • dismiss the appeal on the grounds that the decision taken was right and proper, and/or the appellant has not presented sufficient evidence to justify further consideration of the appeal; and in so doing affirm the decision in its original form.
    • uphold the appeal after establishing that there is sufficient evidence to support the finding that the decision taken was unreasonable.
  • Where an appeal has been rejected by the Panel on the grounds of it being found to be invalid or lacking in sufficient evidence to justify further consideration, there is no further internal avenue for the appellant to appeal.

6. NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION
The Panel Chair provides written notice of the decision to the appellant, including a statement of reasons for making the decision, as well as notifying them of their right to lodge an external appeal if they are unsatisfied with the decision.

The Chair of the Grievance Appeals Panel will also detail if any corrective or preventative actions are to be taken by the Institute because of the decision.

EXTERNAL APPEAL
The appellant may not be satisfied with the outcome of the internal appeal process and is entitled to proceed to an external authority. For an external review to be approved, a complainant must have exhausted the internal grievances procedures outlined in this policy. GLI subscribes to the following external mediator services at no cost to the appellant:

Independent Higher Education Australia (IHEA)
Phone: 03 9642 5212
Email: contact@ihea.edu.au
Website: https://ihea.edu.au

The IHEA appointed external reviewer will make a decision and advise the relevant officer of GLI, the appellant, and IHEA within 30 days, providing in writing the reasons and rationale for any decisions and/or actions to be taken. The relevant GLI officer will ensure that recommendations of the IHEA appointed external reviewer are implemented within 20 working days. Decisions of the appointed reviewer shall be final and binding on all parties.

OR

Nominations Services Officer
Resolution Institute, Level 2, 13-15 Bridge Street, Sydney 2000
Email: infoaus@resolution.institute
Website: www.resolution.institute

There is no cost for the student to access external mediation from the nominated services listed above.

International Students
International students or prospective students who wish to lodge an external appeal can contact the Overseas Students Ombudsman. This service is free. See the Overseas Students Ombudsman for more information.

The appellant and GLI are bound by the decision of the ombudsman and such decisions are final and non-reviewable. While the parties attempt to resolve the matter, an enrolled student may continue to attend classes as normal unless the student has a reasonable concern about an imminent risk to their health and safety.

CONFIDENTIALITY
All documentation relating to grievances or appeals will be kept confidential and will be disclosed only to those persons who have a right to the information by virtue of their role in the review or appeal process, or as required by law.

Close

Amazing Opportunities

for everyone

Apply Now