PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy is to outline the development and review processes for Global Leadership Institute (GLI) courses.
SCOPE
All courses
PRINCIPLES
GLI ensures that new courses (including nested courses):
- align to the GLI Strategic Plan, as well as the vision, mission and values of GLI;
- conform to the Australian Qualifications Framework (AQF), Higher Education Standards (Threshold Standards), relevant accrediting bodies, and other relevant national or international protocols;
- contribute to the development and assessment of GLI’s Graduate Attributes;
- demonstrate equity of experience for diverse students across all delivery sites and modes;
- constructively align course learning outcomes, unit learning outcomes, and unit assessment tasks;
- build on clearly stated prerequisite knowledge and/or assumed background;
- adhere to GLI’s quality assurance processes, including courses delivered by a third party.
Course Advisory Committee is an ad-hoc subcommittee of Academic Board that is convened to develop or review courses. The Chair is appointed by Academic Board. In addition to relevant GLI academic staff, membership of Course Advisory Committee includes at least one external academic expert and one industry expert in the field. Course Advisory Committee may appoint ad hoc specialist subcommittees or advisory groups to assist in its role.
Micro-credentials
A micro-credential is a certification of assessed learning or competency, with a minimum volume of learning of one hour and less than an AQF award qualification, that is additional, alternate, complementary to or a component part of an AQF qualification (adopted from National Micro-credentials Framework, 2021)
Micro-credential students have access to GLI’s library and information resources. GLI micro-credential modules:
- are approved by Academic Board;
- delivered by discipline experts or experienced practitioners online, on campus, or in blended mode;
- assessed against clearly stated learning outcomes;
- do not lead to an accredited AQF qualification but may count as partial credit in some cases;
- are assigned a credit point value and corresponding volume of learning in hours;
- may be ‘stacked’ to contribute to an AQF award using the unit of exchange;
- subject of GLI’s quality assurance system;
- verified via metadata on digital certification such as a badge or other means;
- incur micro-credential fees.
PROCEDURES
COURSE DEVELOPMENT PROCEDURE
- Proposal recommended by Executive Management Team The new course development proposal is tabled to Executive Management Team for recommendation. The proposal includes:
- course title
- broad, narrow, and detail fields of education
- commencement date
- CRICOS registration
- delivery sites and modes
- synopsis and market analysis
- course rationale
- admission criteria
- budget for design, development, pre-delivery implementation, and delivery
- course learning outcomes
- course structure
- Proposal recommended by Academic Board
The proposal is tabled to Academic Board for recommendation. - Budget recommended by Finance and Budget Committee
If it is recommended by both Academic Board and Executive Management Team, the proposed budget is tabled to Finance and Budget Committee. - Approved to develop by Governing Board
If it is recommended by both Academic Board and Executive Management Team, the proposal is tabled to Governing Board for approval to develop. - Course Advisory Committee appointed
If approved by Governing Board, a Course Advisory Committee is appointed to oversee the development of the course, including benchmarking and external peer review of unit outlines. - External Expert Reviewers commissioned
Course Advisory Committee commissions two External Expert Reviewers in Australia who are recognised in the field to ensure rigorous and appropriate content and processes. The External Expert Reviewers submit reports to Course Advisory Committee for review. - Final draft commended by Course Advisory Committee
Course Advisory Committee responds to the External Expert Review Reports and the final draft is tabled at Academic Board for approval. - Approved to submit by Academic Board
Academic Board reviews the course review or course reaccreditation application. Once satisfied, Academic Board tasks Development Committee to submit the application to the relevant accrediting bodies if required. - Submitted to accrediting bodies
The final application for course accreditation is submitted to Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA) and professional accrediting agencies if required. No advertising or promotion of a new course is permitted until accreditation approval has been granted by TEQSA and relevant professional accrediting agencies if required. - Stakeholders informed
Program Directors put in place mechanisms and processes (including websites), to ensure all stakeholders, including students, are informed of the new course.
MICRO-CREDENTIALS
To obtain approval for a new micro-credential, a proposal is made to Academic Board by the relevant Program Director. The proposal must include:
- name for the micro-credential
- business case, including budget;
- volume of learning and credit point value;
- assessments mapped to learning outcomes;
If Academic Board is satisfied that the micro-credential is consistent with GLI’s policies, the micro-credential will be endorsed.
Once endorsed, the proposal will be forwarded to the Academic Dean for approval to develop. Once approved by the Academic Dean, the micro-credential may be developed using GLI’s designated platform and development guidelines.












